================
@@ -249,9 +254,10 @@ static void
visitLocalsRetainedByReferenceBinding(IndirectLocalPath &Path,
LocalVisitor Visit);
template <typename T> static bool isRecordWithAttr(QualType Type) {
- if (auto *RD = Type->getAsCXXRecordDecl())
- return RD->hasAttr<T>();
- return false;
+ CXXRecordDecl *RD = Type.getNonReferenceType()->getAsCXXRecordDecl();
----------------
Xazax-hun wrote:
I am a bit worried here. While `lifetime_capture_by` applies to the value
behind the reference, `lifetimebound` always apply to the top level construct
(so the reference itself). So I am wondering if this change is correct when we
process a lifetimebound annotation.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115921
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
