AaronBallman wrote: > I agree in general that C/C++ has no semantic meaning ascribed to address > spaces.
Err, C does. Please see TR 18037 (https://standards.iso.org/ittf/PubliclyAvailableStandards/c051126_ISO_IEC_TR_18037_2008.zip) AIUI, we've extended the C extension into C++, so we should be following the C semantics while mapping them on to C++'s stronger type system as closely as we can. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/115777 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
