kovdan01 wrote: > Using cc1 options looks fine.
Thanks! > Sorry, I made a mistake by approving #85235, which added a lot of driver > options. It's not clear who are the initial ELF ptrauth users, but I am not > sure with a very small user base, there are a lot of demands to customize the > protection in such a fine-grained manner. I personally am OK with deleting those driver flags and only leaving cc1 flags - I'll prepare a corresponding PR for that. Also tagging @ahmedbougacha https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96160 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
