hubert-reinterpretcast wrote: > Is it worth adding `ClangABICompat` support for this? (Do we think this will > affect any real code, or is this more just formal correctness?)
The change was motivated by formal correctness (and the work led to the discovery of CWG 2946). I have some doubts that this change affects real code as the combination of `(func)(args ...)` in the signature of a lambda in an ODR context seems rare to me. That said, if we don't add a `ClangABICompat` option now, then changing the meaning of `-fclang-abi-compat=19` in the future (if it is needed) could lead to a need for `-fclang-abi-compat=19-compat-under-20` or other such "compat compat" options. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/114884 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
