Prazek added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D29839#674301, @xazax.hun wrote:
> Shouldn't this be a path sensitive check within the clang static analyzer > instead? So branches are properly handled and interprocedural analysis is > done. Do you have some examples? I would argue, that even if you would have code that firstly uses width(), and then after a while reads input, then this is bugprone, and probably the line initializing width should be just before reading. https://reviews.llvm.org/D29839 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
