================
@@ -0,0 +1,64 @@
+.. title:: clang-tidy - qt-integer-sign-comparison
+
+qt-integer-sign-comparison
+=============================
+
+The qt-integer-sign-comparison check is an alias, please see
+:doc:`modernize-use-integer-sign-comparison
<../modernize/use-integer-sign-comparison>`
+for more information.
+
+Examples of fixes created by the check:
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ uint func(int bla)
+ {
+ uint result;
+ if (result == bla)
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+in C++17 becomes
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ <QtCore/q20utility.h>
+
+ uint func(int bla)
+ {
+ uint result;
+ if (q20::cmp_equal(result, bla))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+in C++20 becomes
+
+.. code-block:: c++
+
+ #include <utility>
+
+ uint func(int bla)
+ {
+ uint result;
+ if (std::cmp_equal(result, bla))
+ return 0;
+
+ return 1;
+ }
+
+Options
+-------
+
+.. option:: IncludeStyle
+
+ A string specifying which include-style is used, `llvm` or `google`.
+ Default is `llvm`.
+
+.. option:: IsQtApplication
+
+ When `true`, then it is assumed that the code being analyzed is the Qt-based
code.
----------------
5chmidti wrote:
> When `true`, it is assumed that the code being analyzed is using the Qt
> framework.
Sounds better
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113144
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
