5chmidti wrote: > Do I understand correctly that this is a partial fix for > [clangd/clangd#1254](https://github.com/clangd/clangd/issues/1254) in that it > addresses the issue with overloaded operators in particular, but it still > leaves in place the limitation that a **single** expression statement (of any > kind) cannot be extracted?
Exactly > If so, would you mind adding an "unavailable" test case for the latter case, > with some sort of "TODO, we'd like to relax this limitation" comment? Done https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/81640 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
