efriedma-quic wrote:
> I could not find back if you are allowed to use an inline assembly memory
> operand for such an instruction (*), but it certainly seems a real risk that
> users are doing this.
Tried some quick tests; in the following, gcc doesn't eliminate the load:
```
int f(int *rr) {
int a = 10;
int *r;
asm("leaq %1, %0" : "=r" (r) : "m" (a));
*r = 20;
return a;
}
```
So I guess we should do the same thing.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110510
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
