================
@@ -108,11 +108,15 @@ RawAddress CodeGenFunction::CreateTempAlloca(llvm::Type
*Ty, CharUnits Align,
if (AllocaAddr)
*AllocaAddr = Alloca;
llvm::Value *V = Alloca.getPointer();
+ assert((!getLangOpts().OpenCL ||
+ CGM.getTarget().getTargetAddressSpace(getASTAllocaAddressSpace()) ==
+ CGM.getTarget().getTargetAddressSpace(LangAS::opencl_private)) &&
+ "For OpenCL allocas must allocate in the private address space!");
----------------
arsenm wrote:
Yes (but will be invalid if they ever fix up that hack, as there have been
posts suggesting favor of in the past)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113930
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
