================
@@ -703,6 +715,39 @@ SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerSELECT_CC(SDValue Op,
SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
return DAG.getNode(BPFISD::SELECT_CC, DL, VTs, Ops);
}
+SDValue BPFTargetLowering::LowerATOMIC_LOAD(SDValue Op,
+ SelectionDAG &DAG) const {
+ const char *Msg =
+ "sequentially consistent (seq_cst) atomic load is not supported";
----------------
arsenm wrote:
I wouldn't.
Plus I think such an error should be relegated to an unsupported legalize
action.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
