nicovank wrote:

I fixed a similar issue in 0aaac4fe194ae2249e1a01f9d6f5eac0d75c5bb2. There's an 
argument to be made whether this should be in the matchers (`isPOD`, 
`isAggregate` like here) versus an `hasDefinition` call in the parent before 
calling those matchers. I am slightly leaning towards the latter but this is 
not a strong opinion.

Add a small release notes entry?

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/113688
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to