Cydox wrote:
> For the record, I think the most correct definition, in terms of "this is how
> much memory you should allocate for a struct with a flexible array member" is
> this:
>
> ```c
> max(
> sizeof(struct S), // always at least the size of the struct itself
> round_up(
> alignof(struct S), // size must be a multiple of alignment
> offsetof(struct S, fam) + count * sizeof(((struct S *)0)->fam[0])
> )
> )
> ```
I mean it would be useful to round up to the alignment for when you wanne have
an array of the structs, but I'm not sure this is actually required by the
standard. Do you have more justification for the alignment requirement on
structs containing FAMs?
I would argue the minimum "legal" amount to allocate is:
```C
max(
sizeof(struct S),
offsetof(struct S, fam) + count * sizeof(((struct S *)0)->fam[0])
)
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112636
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
