================
@@ -102,7 +102,7 @@ struct __aliasing_iterator_wrapper {
_LIBCPP_HIDE_FROM_ABI _Alias operator*() const _NOEXCEPT {
_Alias __val;
- __builtin_memcpy(&__val, std::__to_address(__base_), sizeof(value_type));
+ __builtin_memcpy(&__val, static_cast<const
void*>(std::__to_address(__base_)), sizeof(value_type));
----------------
philnik777 wrote:
I think so. If this is indeed UB we can still add the warnings later. It's
always harder to get users to re-enable a warning than to introduce it in the
first place. But let's see what @AaronBallman's thoughts on this are.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111434
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
