mstorsjo wrote: > This patch is about respecting local config, which is the exact opposite of > that suggestion. It would be a way to solve the line-ending issue by fiat, > not by co-operation, so I'm against it on principle. To be clear I very much > don't like CRLF, but I also very much don't like it when someone forces me to > use wrong-handed tools. Windows users would be forced to use wrong handed > tools if we force line-endings one way or another
Also FWIW, I wouldn't that much mind letting users pick whichever form of line endings they would like, if all tests would have been cleaned up _before_ this, so that they pass regardless of the user choice or tool defaults - but alas, there still are >70 Clang tests failing. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86318 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
