Author: marshall
Date: Mon Feb 6 09:17:22 2017
New Revision: 294189
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=294189&view=rev
Log:
Set up 'upcoming meeting' bug list
Modified:
libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
Modified: libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html
URL:
http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project/libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html?rev=294189&r1=294188&r2=294189&view=diff
==============================================================================
--- libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html (original)
+++ libcxx/trunk/www/upcoming_meeting.html Mon Feb 6 09:17:22 2017
@@ -59,163 +59,71 @@
<table id="issues" border="1">
<tr><th>Issue #</th><th>Issue
Name</th><th>Meeting</th><th>Status</th></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2062";>2062</a></td><td>Effect
contradictions w/o no-throw guarantee of std::function
swaps</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2166";>2166</a></td><td>Heap
property underspecified?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2221";>2221</a></td><td>No
formatted output operator for nullptr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch
ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2223";>2223</a></td><td>shrink_to_fit effect on
iterator validity</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2261";>2261</a></td><td>Are
containers required to use their 'pointer' type
internally?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2394";>2394</a></td><td>locale::name specification
unclear - what is implementation-defined?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to
do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2460";>2460</a></td><td>LWG issue
2408 and value categories</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2468";>2468</a></td><td>Self-move-assignment of
library types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2475";>2475</a></td><td>Allow
overwriting of std::basic_string terminator with charT() to allow cleaner
interoperation with legacy APIs</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to
do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2503";>2503</a></td><td>multiline
option should be added to syntax_option_type</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2510";>2510</a></td><td>Tag types
should not be DefaultConstructible</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2514";>2514</a></td><td>Type
traits must not be final</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2519";>2519</a></td><td>Iterator
operator-= has gratuitous undefined behaviour</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing
to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2531";>2531</a></td><td>future::get should explicitly
state that the shared state is released</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2534";>2534</a></td><td>Constrain
rvalue stream operators</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2536";>2536</a></td><td>What
should <complex.h> do?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do
this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2540";>2540</a></td><td>unordered_multimap::insert
hint iterator</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2543";>2543</a></td><td>LWG 2148
(hash support for enum types) seems under-specified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We
already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2544";>2544</a></td><td>istreambuf_iterator(basic_streambuf<charT,
traits>* s) effects unclear when s is 0</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do
this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2556";>2556</a></td><td>Wide
contract for future::share()</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2562";>2562</a></td><td>Consistent
total ordering of pointers by comparison
functors</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2567";>2567</a></td><td>Specification of logical
operator traits uses BaseCharacteristic, which is defined only for
UnaryTypeTraits and BinaryTypeTraits</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to
do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2569";>2569</a></td><td>conjunction and disjunction
requirements are too strict</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do.</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2570";>2570</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] conjunction and
disjunction requirements are too strict</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2578";>2578</a></td><td>Iterator
requirements should reference iterator traits</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing
to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2584";>2584</a></td><td><regex>
ECMAScript IdentityEscape is ambiguous</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2589";>2589</a></td><td>match_results can't satisfy
the requirements of a container</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2591";>2591</a></td><td>std::function's member
template target() should not lead to undefined
behaviour</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2598";>2598</a></td><td>addressof
works on temporaries</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2664";>2664</a></td><td>operator/
(and other append) semantics not useful if argument has
root</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2665";>2665</a></td><td>remove_filename() post
condition is incorrect</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>See Below</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2672";>2672</a></td><td>Should
is_empty use error_code in its specification?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We
already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2678";>2678</a></td><td>std::filesystem enum classes
overspecified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2679";>2679</a></td><td>Inconsistent Use of Effects
and Equivalent To</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2680";>2680</a></td><td>Add
"Equivalent to" to filesystem</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2681";>2681</a></td><td>filesystem::copy() cannot copy
symlinks</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2682";>2682</a></td><td>filesystem::copy() won't
create a symlink to a directory</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in
trunk</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2686";>2686</a></td><td>Why is
std::hash specialized for error_code, but not
error_condition?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2694";>2694</a></td><td>Application of LWG 436
accidentally deleted definition of "facet"</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to
do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2696";>2696</a></td><td>Interaction between
make_shared and enable_shared_from_this is
underspecified</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2699";>2699</a></td><td>Missing
restriction in [numeric.requirements]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2712";>2712</a></td><td>copy_file(from, to, ...) has a
number of unspecified error conditions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in
trunk</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2722";>2722</a></td><td>equivalent
incorrectly specifies throws clause</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do
this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2729";>2729</a></td><td>Missing
SFINAE on std::pair::operator=</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2732";>2732</a></td><td>Questionable specification of
path::operator/= and path::append</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to
do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2733";>2733</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] gcd / lcm and
bool</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2735";>2735</a></td><td>std::abs(short),
std::abs(signed char) and others should return int instead of double in order
to be compatible with C++98 and C</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2736";>2736</a></td><td>nullopt_t
insufficiently constrained</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2738";>2738</a></td><td>is_constructible with void
types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2739";>2739</a></td><td>Issue with
time_point non-member subtraction with an unsigned
duration</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2740";>2740</a></td><td>constexpr
optional<T>::operator-></td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2742";>2742</a></td><td>Inconsistent string interface
taking string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2744";>2744</a></td><td>any's
in_place constructors</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2745";>2745</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] Implementability
of LWG 2451</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2747";>2747</a></td><td>Possibly
redundant std::move in [alg.foreach]</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch
ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2748";>2748</a></td><td>swappable
traits for optionals</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2749";>2749</a></td><td>swappable
traits for variants</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2750";>2750</a></td><td>[fund.ts.v2] LWG 2451
conversion constructor constraint</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2752";>2752</a></td><td>"Throws:"
clauses of async and packaged_task are
unimplementable</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2753";>2753</a></td><td>Optional's
constructors and assignments need constraints</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We
already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2754";>2754</a></td><td>The
in_place constructors and emplace functions added by P0032R3 don't require
CopyConstructible</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2755";>2755</a></td><td>ยง[string.view.io] uses
non-existent basic_string_view::to_string function</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We
already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2756";>2756</a></td><td>C++ WP
optional<T> should 'forward' T's implicit
conversions</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2758";>2758</a></td><td>std::string{}.assign("ABCDE",
0, 1) is ambiguous</td><td>We already do this</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2759";>2759</a></td><td>gcd / lcm
and bool for the WP</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2760";>2760</a></td><td>non-const
basic_string::data should not invalidate
iterators</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Nothing to do</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2765";>2765</a></td><td>Did LWG
1123 go too far?</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2767";>2767</a></td><td>not_fn
call_wrapper can form invalid types</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do
this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768";>2768</a></td><td>any_cast
and move semantics</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Resolved by LWG 2769</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769";>2769</a></td><td>Redundant
const in the return type of any_cast(const
any&)</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Implemented in trunk</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2771";>2771</a></td><td>Broken
Effects of some basic_string::compare functions in terms of
basic_string_view</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>We already do this</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2773";>2773</a></td><td>Making
std::ignore constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2777";>2777</a></td><td>basic_string_view::copy should
use char_traits::copy</td><td>Issaquah</td><td>Patch Ready</td></tr>
- <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2778";>2778</a></td><td>basic_string_view is missing
constexpr</td><td>Issaquah</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2260";>2260</a></td><td>Missing
requirement for Allocator::pointer</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2768";>2768</a></td><td>any_cast
and move semantics</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2769";>2769</a></td><td>Redundant
const in the return type of any_cast(const
any&)</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2781";>2781</a></td><td>Contradictory requirements for
std::function and std::reference_wrapper</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2782";>2782</a></td><td>scoped_allocator_adaptor
constructors must be constrained</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2784";>2784</a></td><td>Resolution
to LWG 2484 is missing "otherwise, no effects" and is hard to
parse</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2785";>2785</a></td><td>quoted
should work with basic_string_view</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this
already</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2786";>2786</a></td><td>Annex C
should mention shared_ptr changes for array
support</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2787";>2787</a></td><td>§[file_status.cons]
doesn't match class definition</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2789";>2789</a></td><td>Equivalence
of contained objects</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2794";>2794</a></td><td>Missing
requirements for allocator pointers</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2795";>2795</a></td><td>§[global.functions]
provides incorrect example of ADL use</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to
do</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2804";>2804</a></td><td>Unconditional constexpr
default constructor for istream_iterator</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this
already</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2812";>2812</a></td><td>Range
access is available with <string_view></td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this
already</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2824";>2824</a></td><td>list::sort
should say that the order of elements is unspecified if an exception is
thrown</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2826";>2826</a></td><td>string_view
iterators use old wording</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2834";>2834</a></td><td>Resolution
LWG 2223 is missing wording about end iterators</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>Nothing
to do</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2835";>2835</a></td><td>LWG 2536
seems to misspecify <tgmath.h></td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2837";>2837</a></td><td>gcd and lcm
should support a wider range of input values</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2838";>2838</a></td><td>is_literal_type specification
needs a little cleanup</td><td>Kona</td>><td><i>Nothing to do</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2842";>2842</a></td><td>in_place_t
check for optional::optional(U&&) should decay
U</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2850";>2850</a></td><td>std::function move constructor
does unnecessary work</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2853";>2853</a></td><td>Possible
inconsistency in specification of erase in
[vector.modifiers]</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2855";>2855</a></td><td>std::throw_with_nested("string_literal")</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+
+ <tr><td></td><td><center><b>Priority 1
Bugs</b></center></td><td></td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2665";>2665</a></td><td>remove_filename() post
condition is incorrect</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a href="http://wg21.link/LWG2806";>2806</a></td><td>Base class
of bad_optional_access</td><td>Kona</td><td><i>We do this already</i></td></tr>
+ <tr><td><a
href="http://wg21.link/LWG2857";>2857</a></td><td>{variant,optional,any}::emplace
should return the constructed value</td><td>Kona</td><td></td></tr>
+
</table>
<h3>Comments about the issues</h3>
<ul>
-<li>2062 - We already do this; added some tests to make sure we keep doing
so.</li>
-<li>2166 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the
existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
-<li>2221 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2223 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2261 - <b>Survey our containers to make sure we do this.</b> Ideally, this
will result in no code changes.</li>
-<li>2394 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
-<li>2460 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
-<li>2468 - <i>I think we already do this; but will need to survey the libray
to be sure</i></li>
-<li>2475 - Nothing to do here. </li>
-<li>2503 - </li>
-<li>2510 - <b>Need to write tests for all the tag types</b></li>
-<li>2514 - Nothing to do; We don't mark any of the type traits as final. </li>
-<li>2519 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2531 - This <b>should be</b> just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2534 - </li>
-<li>2536 - We already do this. </li>
-<li>2540 - We already do this, and have tests for it.</li>
-<li>2543 - </li>
-<li>2544 - We already do this; I've added tests to make sure we keep doing
so</li>
-<li>2556 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2562 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the
existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
-<li>2567 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
-<li>2569 - This is just wording cleanup.</li>
-<li>2570 - Same as 2569, but applied to LFTS</li>
-<li>2578 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2584 - </li>
-<li>2589 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2591 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the
existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
-<li>2598 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2664 - No change needed. _LIBCPP_DEBUG mode tests the new
requirements.</li>
-<li>2665 - PR is incorrect as-is. We implement a modified version</li>
-<li>2672 - Patch and tests in tree. </li>
-<li>2678 - No change needed. Mostly wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2679 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2680 - This is just wording cleanup. </li>
-<li>2681 - LGTM </li>
-<li>2682 - Current PR is incorrect. A modified version has been
implemented</li>
-<li>2686 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2694 - Restoring inadvertently deleted text. No code changes needed.</li>
-<li>2696 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the
existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
-<li>2699 - I don't think this requires any code changes; look more
closely.</li>
-<li>2712 - LGTM. </li>
-<li>2722 - LGTM </li>
-<li>2729 - </li>
-<li>2732 - Our implementation is already equivalent. </li>
-<li>2733 - LFTS; same as 2759</li>
-<li>2735 - I <b>suspect</b> that this is just better specification of the
existing structure. Probably need more tests for this.</li>
-<li>2736 - </li>
-<li>2738 - We already do this; I added tests for cv-void</li>
-<li>2739 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2740 - <i>std::optional</i>: The resolution LGTM. </li>
-<li>2742 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2744 - <i>std::any</i>: We already do this. We also check for a decayed
in_place_type_t. </li>
-<li>2745 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
-<li>2747 - Patch ready, but I can't think of any way to test it.</li>
-<li>2748 - <i>std::optional</i>: LGTM. </li>
-<li>2749 - <i>std::variant</i></li>
-<li>2750 - <i>std::optional</i> for LFTS -- should be considered for C++17</li>
-<li>2752 - </li>
-<li>2753 - <i>std::optional</i>: LGTM. </li>
-<li>2754 - <i>std::any</i>: LGTM. </li>
-<li>2755 - Both string and string_view call a common routine for output; so no
code changes needed.</li>
-<li>2756 - <i>std::optional</i>: Very large change. It is fully implemented
and tested. </li>
-<li>2758 - We already do this. </li>
-<li>2759 - Patch and tests ready</li>
-<li>2760 - This is just wording cleanup; no code or test changes needed.</li>
-<li>2765 - is this just wording cleanup????? I don't think this actually
requires code changes. </li>
-<li>2767 - The test case on the issue is incorrect. See not_fn.pass.cpp for
the correct test case. </li>
-<li>2768 - <i>std::any</i>: There is no PR for this issue. It is resolved by
LWG 2769. </li>
-<li>2769 - <i>std::any</i>: The PR looks good except that
- <code>remove_reference_t<remove_cv_t<T>></code> should read
- <code>remove_cv_t<remove_reference_t<T>></code>. </li>
-<li>2771 - We already do this.</li>
-<li>2773 - </li>
-<li>2777 - Patch ready; existing tests should suffice</li>
-<li>2778 - This is mostly tests.</li>
+<li>2260 - Check our current allocators to make sure we do this</li>
+<li>2768 - Resolution is "apply 2769"</li>
+<li>2769 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
+<li>2781 - </li>
+<li>2782 - Looks straightforward.</li>
+<li>2784 - I think we do this already; maybe more tests (esp about
'inaccessible base class')</li>
+<li>2785 - We do this already.</li>
+<li>2786 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
+<li>2787 - Eric? </li>
+<li>2789 - I don't think there are any code changes required here</li>
+<li>2794 - I don't think there are any code changes required here - maybe a
static_assert.</li>
+<li>2795 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
+<li>2804 - We do this already.</li>
+<li>2812 - We do this already.</li>
+<li>2824 - Nothing do to here, but we should add some throwing sort tests.</li>
+<li>2826 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
+<li>2834 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
+<li>2835 - I'm pretty sure we already do this.</li>
+<li>2837 - Doesn't look too hard.</li>
+<li>2838 - Nothing to do; just moving words around</li>
+<li>2842 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li>
+<li>2850 - I think we already do this.</li>
+<li>2853 - I think that this will be mostly adding tests.</li>
+<li>2855 - This should be easy; trick will be devising tests.</li></li>
+<li></li>
+<li>2665 - Eric? </li>
+<li>2806 - We do this already.</li>
+<li>2857 - This is the subject of several NB comments.</li>
</ul>
-<p>Last Updated: 10-Oct-2016</p>
+<p>Last Updated: 6-Feb-2017</p>
</div>
</body>
</html>
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
