ChuanqiXu9 wrote: > > Thanks for the analysis. I feel (2) is easier to me IIUC. I feel it is a > > natural extension of your previous work. WDYT? > > I implemented this approach and it works. I tried to limit eager > deserialization to the minimal set of functions (at the moment it is friend > inline friend functions). PTAL.
LGTM. And a minor point is, the term "eager deserialization" makes me to think you're going to deserialize the decls eagerly, which made me shocked initially : ) let's wait for @ilya-biryukov and see if he can give a test for this on google's workloads before landing https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111992 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
