yingopq wrote: > This looks technically fine, but I'm having trouble finding a normative > reference for this. Is there an ABI specification for N32/N64 somewhere? > > Also, what alignment does clang use for o32 with ForceEnableInt128? > > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/blob/cb2f1619575400a402ffe11040bb927b0fa35910/clang/lib/Basic/Targets/Mips.h#L441 > > Possibly we need to specify the alignment in that case as well to cover that > option.
@nikic I checked several other arch-32 situations with ForceEnableInt128, and they all use `alloca i128, align 16`. But they did not modify the target datalayout content with `i128:128`, should mips be consistent? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112084 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
