================ @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -; RUN: llc -filetype=obj %s -o %t.o +; RUN: llc -filetype=obj -mattr=-bulk-memory %s -o %t.o ---------------- dschuff wrote:
Hm, interesting, so we are using passive segments anytime bulk memory is enabled. That makes sense since this was all meant for threads, but is this actually an improvement in the non-threads case? i.e. maybe we don't want the extra explicit initialization code if we can help it? edit: i just checked this out but I'll leave it here FTR: it looks like after linking we actually don't use passive segments unless threads is also enabled. so this seems like not a problem. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112049 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
