================
@@ -3742,23 +3742,20 @@ void ExprEngine::evalLocation(ExplodedNodeSet &Dst,
BldrTop.addNodes(Tmp);
}
-std::pair<const ProgramPointTag *, const ProgramPointTag*>
-ExprEngine::geteagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTags() {
- static SimpleProgramPointTag
- eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTrue(TagProviderName,
- "Eagerly Assume True"),
- eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationFalse(TagProviderName,
- "Eagerly Assume False");
- return std::make_pair(&eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationTrue,
- &eagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcationFalse);
+std::pair<const ProgramPointTag *, const ProgramPointTag *>
+ExprEngine::getEagerlyAssumeBifurcationTags() {
+ static SimpleProgramPointTag TrueTag(TagProviderName, "Eagerly Assume True"),
+ FalseTag(TagProviderName, "Eagerly Assume False");
+
+ return std::make_pair(&TrueTag, &FalseTag);
}
-void ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBinOpBifurcation(ExplodedNodeSet &Dst,
- ExplodedNodeSet &Src,
- const Expr *Ex) {
+void ExprEngine::evalEagerlyAssumeBifurcation(ExplodedNodeSet &Dst,
+ ExplodedNodeSet &Src,
+ const Expr *Ex) {
StmtNodeBuilder Bldr(Src, Dst, *currBldrCtx);
- for (const auto Pred : Src) {
+ for (ExplodedNode *Pred : Src) {
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
This small clarification is unrelated to everything else -- I just spelled out
the type explicitly because that's the preferred style and I'm already cleaning
up many things in this function.
In theory I could say `ExplodedNode * const Pred` but I don't think that it's
worth to emphasize the `const`ness of the pointer.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112209
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
