================
@@ -1462,6 +1462,8 @@ template <class ELFT> void
Writer<ELFT>::finalizeAddressDependentContent() {
for (;;) {
bool changed = ctx.target->needsThunks
? tc.createThunks(pass, ctx.outputSections)
+ : ctx.arg.emachine == EM_LOONGARCH && !ctx.arg.relax
----------------
SixWeining wrote:
> Yes, it was an oversight. So for scenarios outside of align, is it necessary
> to determine whether or not to apply relaxation via the incoming link
> parameter, i.e. --relax? For example, in the relax function
I'm afraid it's not necessary because R_LARCH_RELAX is converted to R_NONE by
function `getRelExpr` when `--no-relax`.
```
case R_LARCH_RELAX:
return ctx.arg.relax ? R_RELAX_HINT : R_NONE;
case R_LARCH_ALIGN:
return R_RELAX_HINT
```
Is it correct? @MQ-mengqing
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/111488
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
