================ @@ -150,8 +150,8 @@ void test(std::string s, std::string_view sv, sub_string ss, sub_sub_string sss, // CHECK-FIXES: puv.starts_with("a"); puvf.find("a") == 0; - // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: warning: use starts_with - // CHECK-FIXES: puvf.starts_with("a"); + // CHECK-MESSAGES: :[[@LINE-1]]:{{[0-9]+}}: warning: use startsWith + // CHECK-FIXES: puvf.startsWith("a"); ---------------- 5chmidti wrote:
> I feel like most projects are likely to move towards `starts_with` to match > standard if multiple overloads are present, so might as well recommend it > with higher priority. Especially when preparing for future migrations. Done https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/112101 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits