rogfer01 added a comment. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561#662963, @royger wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561#662959, @rogfer01 wrote: > > > We fixed all identified false positives in later patches to this one. So > > maybe you want to check against trunk clang. If trunk still diagnoses false > > positives, please report them to me and I will be more than happy to fix > > them. > > > Can you tell me which revisions are those? It seems like they are not > contained in clang 4.0 AFAICT. https://reviews.llvm.org/rL283304 https://reviews.llvm.org/rL286798 The fixes for the false positives are in the second change but the first is required for the second to apply cleanly. Regards Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D20561 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
