steakhal wrote: > Thanks for the explanation, I agree with your POV and I don't think that we > need a drastic change like renaming or reordering everything. > > However, in this case I think it would be good to remove the type based > section headers, which are no longer accurate. When someone adds a new > option, they can still "follow the visible trend" based on its type, but > perhaps we'll se more options that are placed close to other related options > (with a different type).
+1, Let's drop those comments. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/97298 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
