================
@@ -522,6 +526,28 @@ let Predicates = [BPFNoALU32] in {
}
def STD : STOREi64<BPF_DW, "u64", store>;
+class relaxed_store<PatFrag base>
+ : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr), (base node:$val, node:$ptr)> {
+ let IsAtomic = 1;
+ let IsAtomicOrderingReleaseOrStronger = 0;
+}
+
+class releasing_store<PatFrag base>
+ : PatFrag<(ops node:$val, node:$ptr), (base node:$val, node:$ptr)> {
+ let IsAtomic = 1;
+ let IsAtomicOrderingRelease = 1;
+}
----------------
peilin-ye wrote:
Got it, thanks for the input! I also found this in [Instruction-Level BPF
Memory
Model](https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TaSEfWfLnRUi5KqkavUQyL2tThJXYWHS15qcbxIsFb0/edit?usp=sharing),
section "Atomic Loads" :
> For `__ATOMIC_RELAXED`, these can simply be implemented as plain BPF load
> instructions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108636
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
