================
@@ -3528,6 +3528,17 @@ bool UnwrappedLineParser::parseRequires() {
return false;
}
break;
+ case tok::equalequal:
+ case tok::greaterequal:
+ case tok::lessequal:
+ case tok::r_paren:
+ case tok::pipepipe:
+ if (OpenAngles == 0) {
+ FormatTok = Tokens->setPosition(StoredPosition);
+ parseRequiresClause(RequiresToken);
+ return true;
+ }
+ break;
----------------
owenca wrote:
Instead, how about just moving `case tok::amp:` up?
```
--- a/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Format/UnwrappedLineParser.cpp
@@ -3474,10 +3474,10 @@ bool UnwrappedLineParser::parseRequires() {
case tok::r_paren:
case tok::kw_noexcept:
case tok::kw_const:
+ case tok::amp:
// This is a requires clause.
parseRequiresClause(RequiresToken);
return true;
- case tok::amp:
case tok::ampamp: {
// This can be either:
// if (... && requires (T t) ...)
```
The rationale is that it doesn't make sense to bitwise-and another expression
with a `requires` expression.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/110942
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
