rnk wrote: > Perhaps a worthwhile direction is separating DISubprograms into abstract and > definition portions, much like DWARF does, which would allow us to put these > types into the declaration and have a well defined scope hierarchy: types > that get uniqued refer to the abstract-DISubprogram for their lexical scope.
This sounds like a promising direction to me, but I have no idea what the relative costs are. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75385 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
