================
@@ -551,3 +551,14 @@ struct full_of_empty empty_test_2(void) {
struct full_of_empty e;
return e; // no-warning
}
+
+struct with_explicit_field {
+ int x;
+ int y [[clang::requires_explicit_initialization]]; // expected-note 2{{'y'
declared here}}
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Ah! I see, based on your previous response, I thought you knew what they were.
Basically, putting the note on the line it happened splits the errors up from
the note, making it unclear what is actually happening while reviewing, so I
tend to insist (unless it is a super short/obvious test) that we use the
'bookmark'/'marker' feature. Where you do something like:
```
int ThingThatCausesANote; // #NOTELOC
....
void ErrorThing();
// expected-error@-1 {{Error Text}}
// expected-note@#NOTELOC {{Note Text}}
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
