================
@@ -5444,6 +5444,43 @@ AST_MATCHER(FunctionDecl, isDefaulted) {
return Node.isDefaulted();
}
+/// Matches trivial methods and types.
----------------
ilya-biryukov wrote:
I do not think is actually matches `types`, but rather `classes` or
`CXXRecordDecl`.
And the question is: should it?
I believe we could extend this matcher to also work on types and type locs.
Do you see any downsides to that? (same for the other matcher)
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90634
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
