================
@@ -16,21 +16,93 @@
#include "clang/Basic/Builtins.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/BuiltinCheckerRegistration.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/Taint.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/Checker.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/CheckerManager.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerHelpers.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/DynamicExtent.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/SVals.h"
using namespace clang;
using namespace ento;
+using namespace taint;
namespace {
+QualType getSufficientTypeForOverflowOp(CheckerContext &C, const QualType &T) {
+ // Calling a builtin with a non-integer type result produces compiler error.
+ assert(T->isIntegerType());
+
+ ASTContext &ACtx = C.getASTContext();
+
+ unsigned BitWidth = ACtx.getIntWidth(T);
+ return ACtx.getIntTypeForBitwidth(BitWidth * 2, T->isSignedIntegerType());
----------------
NagyDonat wrote:
That's good enough for practical purposes. I guess that perhaps we could get an
incorrect result in some weird corner case, but I don't think that it'll appear
in real-world code.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102602
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
