=?utf-8?q?DonĂ¡t?= Nagy <donat.n...@ericsson.com> Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <llvm.org/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109...@github.com>
================ @@ -2808,27 +2825,63 @@ void ExprEngine::processBranch(const Stmt *Condition, std::tie(StTrue, StFalse) = *KnownCondValueAssumption; else { assert(!isa<ObjCForCollectionStmt>(Condition)); + // TODO: instead of this shortcut perhaps it would be better to "rejoin" + // the common execution path with + // StTrue = StFalse = PrevState; ---------------- steakhal wrote: I'd rather drop this, as it's not clear when could we achieve this. Unactionable comments are not useful long term. I'd expect contributors being able to push for a change like this be able to pinpoint this location in source code without any external help. For anyone else, it's just noise and confusing. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109804 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits