zyn0217 wrote: > Therefore, I recommend adding the void parameter check directly into > SemaExprCXX for an immediate fix. If there's a future need to consolidate the > checks, we can consider refactoring later.
That works for me if it turns out to take much more effort than our anticipation, although it's really a shame for us to end up strewing the check three times. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109831 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
