================
@@ -6457,6 +6472,18 @@ void InitializationSequence::InitializeFrom(Sema &S,
}
}
+ if (!S.getLangOpts().CPlusPlus &&
+ Kind.getKind() == InitializationKind::IK_Default) {
+ RecordDecl *Rec = DestType->getAsRecordDecl();
+ if (Rec && Rec->hasUninitializedExplicitInitFields()) {
+ VarDecl *Var = dyn_cast_or_null<VarDecl>(Entity.getDecl());
+ if (Var && !Initializer) {
----------------
higher-performance wrote:
> What is the `VarDecl` here? Again, we have access to the record-decl, so why
> can't we get the field name here?
The `VarDecl` isn't the field within the class. It's the default-initialized
variable that's missing the field initialization. We don't know which field is
missing (again, per above).
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
