================ @@ -3141,6 +3148,10 @@ def warn_attribute_ignored_no_calls_in_stmt: Warning< "statement">, InGroup<IgnoredAttributes>; +def warn_attribute_needs_aggregate : Warning< ---------------- higher-performance wrote:
Interesting, thanks for the context. From my standpoint, I haven't looked at most of those, but `err_using_if_exists_on_ctor` has a small but crucial difference: the error is a syntactic one that is *directly* caused by the same declaration that is being annotated. Other hand, whether `warn_attribute_needs_aggregate` is triggered depends on a semantic property of the class that is wholistic (caused by other members/aspects of the class) and *not* caused by the annotated field. But yeah, happy to hear what Aaron thinks. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
