hekota wrote: > LGTM > > It's a shame we don't have a better way to review changes like this, so I'm a > little uncomfortable about a commit leaving things in a transitional state, > but I think my appreciation of being able to review this separately from the > next step outweighs that.
Yeah, I had all of the resource codegen changes in one place, but it was huge. So I am splitting it to about 5 separate PRs for easier reviews. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109910 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
