Some more stylistic comments:
The description that you have on CheckShadowInheritedVariables isn't really
the type of comments that we have in doxygen form. Im not sure if its in
line with the rest of the code.
The ignore warning comments are restating what is in the code, please
remove them.
Could you make the header and the source file match the name?
Why are you checking that the DeclContext has a definition rather than the
record itself?
Space after the <<.
Don't use the cast for the check, use isa. Although, since you use the
value later, it is probably better to write this as:
if (const auto *RD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(CurContext))
CheckShadowInheritedVariabless(Loc, Name.getAsString(), RD, RD);
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 4:06 PM, James Sun via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Coding style change
>
>
>
> *From: *James Sun <james...@fb.com>
> *Date: *Tuesday, January 24, 2017 at 2:36 PM
> *To: *"cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org" <cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org>
> *Subject: *Add warning for c++ member variable shadowing
>
>
>
> Dear members
>
>
>
> Here is a patch (attached) to create warnings where a member variable
> shadows the one in one of its inheriting classes. For cases where we really
> don't want to shadow member variables, e.g.
>
>
>
> class a {
>
> int foo;
>
> }
>
>
>
> class b : a {
>
> int foo; // Generate a warning
>
> }
>
>
>
> This patch
>
> (1) adds a member variable shadowing checking, and
>
> (2) incorporates it to the unit tests.
>
>
>
>
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
> James
>
> _______________________________________________
> cfe-commits mailing list
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
>
>
--
Saleem Abdulrasool
compnerd (at) compnerd (dot) org
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
