================
@@ -0,0 +1,90 @@
+// Default cf-branch-label-scheme is func-sig
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv32i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv32 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv32 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -E -dM %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -menable-experimental-extensions \
+// RUN: -march=rv64i_zicfilp1p0 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: not %clang --target=riscv64 -fcf-protection=branch \
+// RUN: -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// RUN: %clang --target=riscv64 -mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig -c %s \
+// RUN: -o /dev/null 2>&1 \
+// RUN: | FileCheck --check-prefix=CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED %s
+
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-UNLABELED-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad_unlabeled 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-ZICFILP-FUNC-SIG-DAG: __riscv_landing_pad_func_sig 1{{$}}
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID: error: option 'cf-protection=branch' cannot be
+// CHECK-BRANCH-PROT-INVALID-SAME: specified on this target
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-UNLABELED-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=unlabeled'
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED: warning: argument unused during compilation:
+// CHECK-FUNC-SIG-SCHEME-UNUSED-SAME: '-mcf-branch-label-scheme=func-sig'
----------------
mylai-mtk wrote:
Fixed: Since `-fcf-protection=branch` is always supported for RISC-V targets,
landing pad macros are no longer absent in the cases of 'no zicfilp +
`-fcf-protection=branch`', and this renders all landing pad macro absence cases
tested.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
