================
@@ -7326,11 +7326,13 @@ void
ItaniumMangleContextImpl::mangleCXXCtorVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD,
raw_ostream &Out) {
// <special-name> ::= TC <type> <offset number> _ <base type>
CXXNameMangler Mangler(*this, Out);
+ QualType RDType = getASTContext().getRecordType(RD);
+ QualType TypeType = getASTContext().getRecordType(Type);
Mangler.getStream() << "_ZTC";
- Mangler.mangleNameOrStandardSubstitution(RD);
+ Mangler.mangleType(RDType);
----------------
mizvekov wrote:
Yes, although as I said before, there should be no observable change for these
other users, as we don't perform other manglings either before or after calling
`mangleNameOrStandardSubstitution`.
I would prefer the ergonomics of a function which takes a CXXRecordDecl.
MangleType is also more complex and will perform a bunch of checks which are
not necessary if you only would ever have a RecordType, so there is also some
aspect of micro-optimization and ease of debugging in having a specialized
function.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109970
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
