================ @@ -119,6 +119,15 @@ FIELD(HasInitMethod, 1, NO_MERGE) /// within anonymous unions or structs. FIELD(HasInClassInitializer, 1, NO_MERGE) +/// Custom attribute that is True if any field is marked as requiring explicit +/// initialization with [[clang::requires_explicit_initialization]] in a type +/// without a user-provided default constructor, or if this is the case for any +/// base classes and/or member variables whose types are aggregates. +/// +/// In this case, default-construction is diagnosed, as it would not explicitly +/// initialize the field. +FIELD(HasUninitializedExplicitInitFields, 1, NO_MERGE) ---------------- higher-performance wrote:
I'm confused - below, you agree that having this field makes sense as the alternative cost is too high. This is merely declaring that field, so that we can use it. What am I doing wrong here? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
