================
@@ -2022,6 +2035,20 @@ bool CompilerInvocation::ParseCodeGenArgs(CodeGenOptions
&Opts, ArgList &Args,
Diags.Report(diag::err_drv_invalid_value) << A->getAsString(Args) <<
Name;
}
+ if (const Arg *A = Args.getLastArg(OPT_mcf_branch_label_scheme_EQ)) {
----------------
mylai-mtk wrote:
I suppose the check can be performed, given that only the RISC-V target uses
it, and checking this prevents the flag from being claimed erroneously to some
extent. However, this doesn't solve the claim issue completely, since at this
point I don't have a `TargetInfo` that allows me to check if `zicfilp` is
enabled; I only have the `TargetOptions::FeatureAsWritten` to be ready to check
for the existence of `+experimental-zicfilp` from command line, which is less
than ideal, I'd say.
Fixed (Checked) in #109784.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109600
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
