llvmbot wrote:
<!--LLVM PR SUMMARY COMMENT-->
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Martin Storsjö (mstorsjo)
<details>
<summary>Changes</summary>
Since a26ec542371652e1d774696e90016fd5b0b1c191, we expand the executable name
to an absolute path, if it isn't already one, if found in path.
This broke a couple tests in some environments; when the clang workdir resides
in a path under e.g. /opt. Tests that only use a tool name like "clang-cl"
would get expanded to the absolute path in the build tree. The loop for finding
the last "-o" like option for clang-cl command lines would inspect all
arguments, including Args[0] which is the executable name itself. As an /opt
path matches Arg.starts_with("/o"), this would get detected as an object file
output name in cases where there was no other explicit output argument.
Thus, this fixes those tests in workdirs under e.g. /opt.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109050.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp (+3-1)
``````````diff
diff --git a/clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp
b/clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp
index ac68e3605a10cb..5d975f8aa82ee5 100644
--- a/clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp
+++ b/clang/tools/clang-scan-deps/ClangScanDeps.cpp
@@ -839,9 +839,11 @@ int clang_scan_deps_main(int argc, char **argv, const
llvm::ToolContext &) {
auto R = std::make_reverse_iterator(FlagsEnd);
for (auto I = R, E = Args.rend(); I != E; ++I) {
StringRef Arg = *I;
+ if ((I + 1) == E) // Don't inspect Args[0] as an option.
+ break;
if (ClangCLMode) {
// Ignore arguments that are preceded by "-Xclang".
- if ((I + 1) != E && I[1] == "-Xclang")
+ if (I[1] == "-Xclang")
continue;
if (LastO.empty()) {
// With clang-cl, the output obj file can be specified with
``````````
</details>
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/109050
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
