efriedma-quic wrote: > I see that it is set and the reason the existing error is not emitted is > because of the !Entry->isDeclaration() condition.
For non-lambda methods, the way this works it that we call GetOrCreateLLVMFunction for both methods... for the first method, the `!Entry->isDeclaration()` would be false, but for the second one, it would be true because we've emitted the definition of the first method. What's different for lambda methods? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107581 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
