cor3ntin wrote: Usually the process requires someone like Aaron to call consensus either way. we are aware that establishing consensus is a bit nebulous at the moment but it's something we are working on improving.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2024, 16:03 Ilya Biryukov ***@***.***> wrote: > I don't think the rfc has reached its conclusion yet, and consensus has > not been called (for example, i still need to think about whether my > questions were addressed) so we should wait for the RFC process before > continuing with that PR. > > Thanks > > Thanks for explicitly calling this out. There were no replies from you on > the RFC for some time, so it was unclear whether there is anything left. We > will be waiting for your feedback on Discourse. > > — > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > <https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040#issuecomment-2349041264>, > or unsubscribe > <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKX7633PBO3XB4FJRFVRGTZWLWCNAVCNFSM6AAAAABMA3ZTVOVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDGNBZGA2DCMRWGQ> > . > You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: > ***@***.***> > https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102040 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
