https://github.com/pogo59 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108300
An 'if' statement introduces a scope, but in some cases the conditional branch
to the then/else blocks had a debug-info attribution that did not include the
scope. This led to some inefficiency in the DWARF line table.
>From 6707864cb883a5ed2f018e2a6e1d70225314e7b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Paul Robinson <paul.robin...@sony.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2024 14:40:46 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [DebugInfo] Correct the line attribution for IF branches
An 'if' statement introduces a scope, but in some cases the
conditional branch to the then/else blocks had a debug-info
attribution that did not include the scope. This led to some
inefficiency in the DWARF line table.
---
clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp | 1 +
.../test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-line-if-2.cpp | 45 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-line-if-2.cpp
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
index b138c87a853495..2fae4cf666c6b9 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGStmt.cpp
@@ -815,6 +815,7 @@ void CodeGenFunction::EmitIfStmt(const IfStmt &S) {
// C99 6.8.4.1: The first substatement is executed if the expression compares
// unequal to 0. The condition must be a scalar type.
LexicalScope ConditionScope(*this, S.getCond()->getSourceRange());
+ ApplyDebugLocation DL(*this, S.getCond());
if (S.getInit())
EmitStmt(S.getInit());
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-line-if-2.cpp
b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-line-if-2.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000000..8ab96a7daf4c47
--- /dev/null
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/debug-info-line-if-2.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -debug-info-kind=limited -gno-column-info
-triple=x86_64-pc-linux -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
+
+// The important thing is that the compare and the conditional branch have
+// locs with the same scope (the lexical block for the 'if'). By turning off
+// column info, they end up with the same !dbg record, which halves the number
+// of checks to verify the scope.
+
+int c = 2;
+
+int f() {
+#line 100
+ if (int a = 5; a > c)
+ return 1;
+ return 0;
+}
+// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z1fv()
+// CHECK: = icmp {{.*}} !dbg [[F_CMP:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 {{.*}} !dbg [[F_CMP]]
+
+int g() {
+#line 200
+ if (int a = f())
+ return 2;
+ return 3;
+}
+// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z1gv()
+// CHECK: = icmp {{.*}} !dbg [[G_CMP:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 {{.*}} !dbg [[G_CMP]]
+
+int h() {
+#line 300
+ if (c > 3)
+ return 4;
+ return 5;
+}
+// CHECK-LABEL: define {{.*}} @_Z1hv()
+// CHECK: = icmp {{.*}} !dbg [[H_CMP:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-NEXT: br i1 {{.*}} !dbg [[H_CMP]]
+
+// CHECK-DAG: [[F_CMP]] = !DILocation(line: 100, scope: [[F_SCOPE:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-DAG: [[F_SCOPE]] = distinct !DILexicalBlock({{.*}} line: 100)
+// CHECK-DAG: [[G_CMP]] = !DILocation(line: 200, scope: [[G_SCOPE:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-DAG: [[G_SCOPE]] = distinct !DILexicalBlock({{.*}} line: 200)
+// CHECK-DAG: [[H_CMP]] = !DILocation(line: 300, scope: [[H_SCOPE:![0-9]+]]
+// CHECK-DAG: [[H_SCOPE]] = distinct !DILexicalBlock({{.*}} line: 300)
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
