AnastasiaStulova wrote: I think that the diagnostic change is reasonable. Clang doesn't support OpenCL C++ at present so we won't need to worry about it. However the mission of C++ for OpenCL is to track C++ and track OpenCL i.e. we may want to update to C++ with reflection. So it would be good to keep this as an option. But we don't have this plan right now.
So if we keep this as reserve identifier for C++ for OpenCL it is probably the best approach since if one day we decide to upgrade it to C++ with reflection the code using ``^^`` would not longer be invalid. Does it make sense? https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108224 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
