================
@@ -67,6 +68,15 @@ class DerefFuncDeleteExprVisitor
const Decl *D = CE->getCalleeDecl();
if (D && D->hasBody())
return VisitBody(D->getBody());
+ else if (!VisitLambdaBody) {
+ for (unsigned i = 0; i < CE->getNumArgs(); ++i) {
+ auto *Arg = CE->getArg(i);
+ VisitLambdaBody = true;
+ auto Restore = llvm::make_scope_exit([&] { VisitLambdaBody = false; });
+ if (VisitChildren(Arg))
----------------
haoNoQ wrote:
You can probably avoid statefulness here if you directly pattern-match the
argument as a lambda (with the help of a few manual `dyn_cast`s) and then
invoke `Visit()` directly on that lambda's body. It'd also make
`VisitLambdaExpr()` unnecessary.
It's usually not a good idea to search for a nested object at arbitrary nesting
depths. When you do that, you lose your ability to confirm the exact
relationship between the current object and the nested object (in our case,
"the lambda is passed to the opaque call as an argument" as opposed to "the
lambda is lexically nested into an argument in any shape or form"). The only
time you actually want to ignore that relationship is in the very top-level
visitor that simply looks for all matching code patterns in the entire
translation unit no matter where they're written in the translation unit. It
typically doesn't make a lot of sense in the middle of the pattern.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107676
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
