4ast wrote: > @yonghong-song, @4ast, > > As a cleanup, Yonghong suggested moving `__BPF_FEATURE_MAY_GOTO` macro so > that it is available for CPUv1. (Although, I think it's better to move both > `__BPF_FEATURE_MAY_GOTO` and `__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST` down to CPUv4, > as this would be more consistent with kernel features support). > > Wdyt?
why force users to specify -mcpu=v4 ? may_goto and addr_cast are fine with v1. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108071 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits