4ast wrote:

> @yonghong-song, @4ast,
> 
> As a cleanup, Yonghong suggested moving `__BPF_FEATURE_MAY_GOTO` macro so 
> that it is available for CPUv1. (Although, I think it's better to move both 
> `__BPF_FEATURE_MAY_GOTO` and `__BPF_FEATURE_ADDR_SPACE_CAST` down to CPUv4, 
> as this would be more consistent with kernel features support).
> 
> Wdyt?

why force users to specify -mcpu=v4 ?
may_goto and addr_cast are fine with v1.

https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/108071
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

Reply via email to