ahatanak added inline comments.
================ Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaCodeComplete.cpp:961 + // then incorrectly applied to the target declaration. This can be avoided + // by resetting the declaration that's being hidden. + if (Hiding && isa<UsingDecl>(Hiding)) ---------------- I'm not sure about this, but is it correct for VisibleDeclsRecord::checkHidden to return the UsingDecl when the UsingShadowDecl is being passed? I'm thinking perhaps the bug is in that function, since it seems like it should just return a nullptr instead if UsingDecl doesn't hide UsingShadowDecl, . Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D28514 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
