================
@@ -2943,6 +2943,9 @@ class Parser : public CodeCompletionHandler {
return false;
}
+ bool ParseGNUSingleAttribute(ParsedAttributes &Attrs, SourceLocation &EndLoc,
----------------
erichkeane wrote:
Ah, I see. The WG14 specified one is `__builtin_has_c_attribute`, correct?
That said, I'd think that we would want the Clang behavior to answer the right
thing for ALL of our attributes (including the MSVC ones). But I then wonder
if, since this is a GCC originating builtin, if we should only accept ones with
a GCC spelling.
So I guess I'm on the fence here. I REALLY wish the name was more GCC
specific, that way we could just match their behavior, but with the name as it
is, I think we have to answer that question for ANY attribute, including
declspecs, standard attributes, or clang extensions.
So perhaps that changes this refactor?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107300
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
