arpith-jacob added inline comments.
================
Comment at: lib/CodeGen/CGStmtOpenMP.cpp:84-115
+/// Lexical scope for OpenMP parallel construct, that handles correct codegen
+/// for captured expressions.
+class OMPParallelScope final : public CodeGenFunction::LexicalScope {
+ void emitPreInitStmt(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const OMPExecutableDirective &S) {
+ OpenMPDirectiveKind Kind = S.getDirectiveKind();
+ if (!isOpenMPTargetExecutionDirective(Kind) &&
+ isOpenMPParallelDirective(Kind)) {
----------------
ABataev wrote:
> Could you join it with `OMPLexicalScope` somehow? I don't like the idea of
> adding a different kind of scope for parallel and other directives.
> Or follow the solution for `OMPLoopScope`, rather than for `OMPLexicalScope`.
Hi Alexey, thanks for looking at this patch.
We need a different kind of scope for 'parallel', however, we don't need a
different scope for any other directive so the code additions should be
limited. Here is my idea for merging it with OMPLexicalScope to reduce code
duplication.
I can make OMPParallelScope derive from OMPLexicalScope. I'll make
emitPreInitStmt a virtual class that can be overridden.
```
class OMPParallelScope final : public OMPLexicalScope {
void emitPreInitStmt(CodeGenFunction &CGF, const OMPExecutableDirective &S)
override {
OpenMPDirectiveKind Kind = S.getDirectiveKind();
if (!isOpenMPTargetExecutionDirective(Kind) &&
isOpenMPParallelDirective(Kind))
OMPParallelScope::emitPreInitStmt(CGF, S);
}
...
}
```
Does that look ok?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D28781
_______________________________________________
cfe-commits mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
