jurahul wrote: > > I propose the following next steps (once this is committed): > > this timeline looks fine, do you also want to add `[[deprecated]]` once the > PSA is out? Also, I can help on other LLVM TableGen backends if they haven't > been updated.
Yeah, once all the upstream backends are migrated, we should mark the non-const ones deprecated. As for other backends, thanks for the offer! I have diffs for clang and mlir, so I am hoping I can do any other remaining ones as well (lldb and libc seem to have one). But if its start to get delayed, I can ping you for help. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/106658 _______________________________________________ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
